• Question: How do you handle disagreements with other scientists?

    Asked by student19 to Jamie, Jodie, Kat, Mark, Niamh on 21 Mar 2011 in Categories: .
    • Photo: Katherine Davies

      Katherine Davies answered on 21 Mar 2011:

      Hi

      I have not experienced any yet. In general, its about appreciating other peoples opinions and coming to a compromise, and also being confident about your research. Sorry I cant say more than that!

    • Photo: Niamh Nic Daeid

      Niamh Nic Daeid answered on 21 Mar 2011:

      hi 19.

      Disagreements can sometimes arise and usually are resolved by getting everyone together to discuss the issues. Sometimes the stakes can be high if the disagreement is about ownership of an idea or piece of work and you have to spend a fair amount of time determining the facts relating to everyones position. Conflict resolution has to be tactfully done so that no one feels disadvantaged or taken advantage of and everyone feels listened to and is content with the overall outcome. So, time and patience, compromise and respect for others points of view are all essential for a good resolution.

    • Photo: Jamie Pringle

      Jamie Pringle answered on 21 Mar 2011:

      hello student19,

      This happens all the time! If it is interpretation of data, then we bat ideas back and forth until we get an agreement (or agree to differ as it is all interpretive!).

      It’s rare that people hostiley disagree, it does happen but we are professionals and we are meant to be unbiased and objective!

    • Photo: Mark Hill

      Mark Hill answered on 21 Mar 2011:

      Hi student19,
      Tactfully and constructively, having done my homework and research very thoroughly. The best example of this is when I am in court, particularly Crown Court, giving evidence. I will not say anything in the box that I cannot back up very well and I am sure of. That is why we peer review our reports before they leave our office. All of the more complex maths is also verified by an expert outside of teh police.

      Managing barristers and solicitors comes with experience, in not being pushed to say something that you are unsure of, or in words that can be misinterpreted and used as a lever to discredit your evidence. I am well versed in court procedure and evidence delivery from 27 years of court appearances. This experience gives a good platform in addressing peer and scientific disputes robustly.

      Good question. Thank you.

      Mark

Comments